The hard work and hassle of ditching paper documentation is not in vain.
Question: Our office is weighing the pros and cons of transitioning to electronic medical records (EMRs). We know the process is a huge undertaking that often results in even lower productivity and more confusion. So, is making the change really worth it?
Answer: If you haven’t witnessed or lead a conversion from paper records to an electronic medical record (EMR) system, it’s easy to get overwhelmed by the potential downsides. But experts agree that yes, going electronic is worth it. Here are a few reasons why:
1. You Open More Cash Inlets. Many research studies pull their data via electronic records. So, if you can’t tune in to participate, opportunities for cash perks will fly by. “Grant money and incentive programs are available, for example, and they want data in the electronic form,” points out Francine Wheelock, PT, MPA, manager of clinical systems for MaineGeneral Health.
Just look at nationwide push for value-based purchasing and outcome data, and expect to go electronic if you want to be in the loop.
Stay alert: Last year, the federal government launched the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, which plans to pay eligible healthcare professionals incentives for the “meaningful use” of certain EMRs.
“SLPs, OTs and PTs are not eligible for the incentive payment,” confirms Kate Romanow, director of health care regulatory advocacy for the American Speech-Language Hearing Association. But they may be eligible in the future, so therapists “may want to consider implementing EHRs now,” she says.
Plus, you can enhance coordination of care with healthcare providers who are eligible for HITECH incentives and are adopting EHRs, points out Sarah Nicholls, assistant director for payment policy and advocacy for the American Physical Therapy Association. So, “think about your business interactions today with those that are eligible.”
2. Quality of Care Gets a Boost. Electronic systems often offer access to a database of national outcomes data from users of the same software — a jewel for measuring and improving your care. Another perk: Many of the systems will connect you to research on best practices for treating certain diagnoses, Wheelock notes. “Thus, an EMR can really help drive evidence-based practice.”
Electronic systems can also help standardize your care.“For example, if your practice sees the same diagnoses very frequently, you could build shells for care plans so that you have some standardization of care to start with, Wheelock adds.
3. Your Clients Expect EMRs. If you work for a rehab agency or are an independent contractor, whoever’s buying your rehab services wants to see a modern operation. “Switching to an EMR is important because when a customer wants you as the vendor to do so, you need to continue to meet the customer’s expectation,” says Kate Brewer, PT, MBA,GCS, VP of Greenfield Rehabilitation Agency in Greenfield, Wis.
Another thought: A more modern feel in your clinic may also help attract new patients who are shopping around for a therapist and are alert to small details like being current with the times.
To read the rest of this article, subscribe to Physical Medicine & Rehab Coding Alert (Editor: Lindsey Rushmore).
Sign up for the upcoming live audio conference, Medical Coding 101: The Need-to-Know for CEOs, or order the CD/transcripts.
Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.
|
Posted by
Editor |
Categories:
Coding Challenge,
EMR,
HIT,
HITECH,
documentation,
electronic medical record,
grant money,
incentive program,
medical records | Tagged:
American Physical Therapy Association,
American Speech Language,
American Speech Language Hearing Association,
Business Interactions,
Clinical Health,
electronic medical record,
electronic medical records,
Electronic Records,
Health Information Technology,
Healthcare Providers,
Incentive Payment,
Incentive Programs,
Inlets,
Nicholls,
Outcome Data,
Paper Documentation,
Regulatory Advocacy,
Romanow,
Speech Language Hearing Association,
Wheelock |
Find out why you should code the pathology exam of uterus with leiomyomas as 88307.
Question: When our pathologist diagnoses uterine fibroid tumors, what ICD-9 code should we use?
Pennsylvania Subscriber
Answer: You should choose the diagnosis based on the fibroid’s location:
- Submucous fibroids (218.0, Submucous leiomyoma of uterus) grow from the uterine wall toward the uterine cavity. They are also called intracavitary fibroids.
- Intramural fibroids (218.1, Intramural leiomyoma of uterus) grow within the uterine wall (myometrium). They are also called interstitial fibroids.
- Subserous fibroids (218.2, Subserous leiomyoma of uterus) grow outward from the uterine wall toward the abdominal cavity. They are also called subperitoneal fibroids.
- If the physician does not specify the uterine fibroid’s location, assign 218.9 (Leiomyoma of uterus, unspecified) as the diagnosis.
CPT alert: You should code the pathology exam of uterus with leiomyomas as 88307 (Level V — Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, uterus, with or without tubes and ovaries, other than neoplastic/prolapse).
Although ICD9 classifies leiomyoma as a benign neoplasm, a coding convention supported by the American Medical Association and the College of American Pathologists dictates that you code this condition as 88307, not 88309 (Level VI — Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, uterus, with or without tubes and ovaries, neoplastic).
For myomectomy specimens — fibroid tumors that the surgeon removes while leaving the uterus intact — bill the pathology exam as 88305 (Level IV — Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, leiomyoma[s], uterine myomectomy — without uterus).
@ Pathology/Lab Coding Alert. Editor: Ellen Garver, CPC
Sign up for the upcoming live audio conference, Optimize Your Fibroid Coding and Billing: The Bottom-Line Basics for the Best Reimbursement, or order the CD/transcripts.
Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.
|
Posted by
Editor |
Categories:
218.0,
218.1,
218.2,
218.9,
88305,
88307,
88309,
Coding Challenge,
fibroid,
leiomyomas,
pathology | Tagged:
Abdominal Cavity,
American Medical Association,
Benign Neoplasm,
Bottom Line Basics,
College Of American Pathologists,
Cpc,
Fibroid Tumors,
Intramural Fibroids,
Intramural Leiomyoma,
Leiomyoma Of Uterus,
leiomyomas,
Microscopic Examination,
Pathologist,
Pathology Lab,
Prolapse,
Specimens,
Submucous Fibroids,
Surgical Pathology,
Uterine Cavity,
Uterine Myomectomy |
Illustration: Heikenwaelder Hugo, Austria.
Tip: You need to know the hook-up date and disconnect day.
Question: Which date(s) of service should I report for 30-day cardiac event monitoring?
Washington Subscriber
Answer: For Noridian Medicare, your Part B administrator for Washington, you’ll need to know both (1) the date the staff hooked up the patient and (2) the day they disconnected the patient. But knowing which dates to report is only half the battle — you also need to know where to report them.
When you’re reporting 30-day cardiac event monitoring, Noridian requires providers to report the hook-up date as the “from” date and the disconnect date as the “through” date in Item 19 of the CMS-1500 (or its electronic equivalent).
Watch out: You should report only the “from” date (that is, the hook-up date) in Item 24A (or its electronic equivalent), Noridian instructs. You should not report the “through” (disconnect) date in 24A because if you have dates spanning two months and only a single unit, “the system inappropriately suspends the claim and asks the provider for clarification,” Noridian states.
The codes for 30-day monitoring include 93268-93272 (Wearable patient activated electrocardiographic rhythm derived event recording with presymptom memory loop, 24-hour attended monitoring, per 30 day period of time …) and 93012-93014 (Telephonic transmission of post-symptom electrocardiogram rhythm strip[s], 24-hour attended monitoring, per 30 day period of time).
Or if the “monitoring service meets the definition of the new 30-day cardiovascular telemetry service,” look to 93228-93229 (Wearable mobile cardiovascular telemetry with electrocardiographic recording, concurrent computerized real time data analysis and greater than 24 hours of accessible ECG data storage [retrievable with query] with ECG triggered and patient selected events transmitted to a remote attended surveillance center for up to 30 days …), Noridian states.
Learn more: You can read more from Noridian in its Medicare B News, Issue 253, April 15, 2009. Head to www.noridianmedicare.com/p-medb/news/, and under “Publications,” choose “Bulletins” and then Issue 253. Then click on “Cardiac Event Monitoring Codes Billing Clarification — Revised.” Other payers may have a different preference, so be sure to check with them and get the preference in writing.
@ Cardiology Coding Alert. Editor: Deborah Dorton, JD, MA, CPC
Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, You Can Use the Appeals Process Like a Pro, or order the CD/transcripts.
Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.
|
Posted by
Editor |
Categories:
93012,
93014,
93228,
93229,
93268,
93272,
Coding Challenge,
Ecg,
cardio | Tagged:
Cardiac Event,
Clarification,
CMS 1500,
Data Storage,
Ecg Data,
Electrocardiogram,
Half The Battle,
Hook Up,
Hugo,
Illustration,
Loop 24,
Medicare,
Memory Loop,
Monitoring Service,
Noridian Medicare,
Period Of Time,
Real Time Data,
Rhythm Strip,
Single Unit,
Surveillance Center |
Decipher why you should include a seconding diagnosis.
Question: A 38-year-old patient presents to the emergency room with complaints of wheezing, coughing, and trouble catching her breath. After the nonphysician practitioner (NPP) performs a problem-focused history, the physician performs a detailed history and exam and discovers focal ronchi. The physician orders a two-view chest x-ray to check for upper respiratory infection (URI) The chest x-ray results reveal acute URI, and the ronchi clears up upon reevaluation. The patient is treated with antibiotics. How should I code this scenario?
Answer:You’ll submit two of each for this claim: CPT codes, modifiers,and ICD-9 codes. On the claim, report the following:
- 71020 (Radiologic examination, chest, 2 views, frontal and lateral) for the x-ray
- Modifier 26 (Professional component) appended 71020 to show that you are coding for the physician’s services only
- 99284 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires these 3 key components: A detailed history; A detailed examination;and Medical decision making of moderate complexity….) for the E/M
- Modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) appended to 99284 show that the E/M and the x-rays were separate services
- 465.9 (Acute upper respiratory infections of multiple or unspecified sites; unspecified site) appended to 71020 and 99284 to represent the patient’s URI
- 786.7 (Symptoms involving respiratory system and other chest symptoms; abnormal chest sounds) appended to 71020 and 99284 to represent the patient’s focal ronchi.
Secondary Dx decoded: Even though the focal ronchi cleared up on reexamination, you should still include 786.7 on the claim. It will help paint a more lucid portrait of the patient’s condition, and can only strengthen your medical necessity case for the chest-x-ray.
@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC
Sign up for the upcoming live audio conference, Top 5 Non-Vascular Interventional Radiology Coding SNAFUs Solved, or order the CD/transcripts.
Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.
|
Posted by
Editor |
Categories:
465.9,
71020,
786.7,
99284,
Coding Challenge,
E/M,
X-ray,
chest,
focal ronchi,
modifier 25,
modifier 26,
radiology | Tagged:
Abnormal Chest,
Chest Symptoms,
Chest X Ray,
Code Pairs,
Cpt Code,
Cpt Codes,
Emergency Department Visit,
Medical Decision,
Moderate Complexity,
Modifiers,
Neces,
NPP,
Physician Orders,
Professional Component,
Reevaluation,
Reexamination,
Respiratory System,
Upper Respiratory Infection,
Upper Respiratory Infections,
X Rays |
Image by Stephen Woods.
You have two options depending on how the physician performed the procedure.
Question: Our orthopedist administered a hip injection under fluoroscopy. Can I report both codes?
Wyoming Subscriber
Answer: You can code both the injection and fluoroscopy, but the correct choices depend on how your physician completed the procedure.
Option 1: If your orthopedist injected radiopaque dye and performed the arthrography concurrently, code the procedure with 27093 (Injection procedure for hip arthrography; without anesthesia).
Option 2: If he completed the guidance and injection as separate procedures, submit 20610 (Arthrocentesis, aspiration, and/or injection; major joint or bursa [e.g., shoulder, hip, knee joint, subacromial bursa]) for the injection. Include 77002 (Fluoroscopic guidance for needle placement [e.g., biopsy, aspiration, injection, localization device]) for the fluoroscopic guidance.
Remember to append modifier 26 (Professional component) to 77002 because your physician performed the service but doesn’t own the fluoroscopy equipment.
SI change: If the physician injects the sacroiliac joint instead of the hip joint, choose either 20610 (Arthrocentesis, aspiration, and/or injection; major joint or bursa [e.g., shoulder, hip, knee joint, subacromial bursa]) or 27096 (Injection procedure for sacroiliac joint, arthrography and/or anesthetic/steroid).
@ Orthopedic Coding Alert. Editor: Leigh DeLozier, CPC
Sign up for the upcoming live audio conference, Coding Tips for Hip Procedures, or order the CD/transcripts.
Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.
|
Posted by
Editor |
Categories:
20610,
27093,
77002,
Coding Challenge,
Guidance,
arthrocentesis,
arthrography,
fluoroscopy,
hip,
injection,
modifier 26,
procedure | Tagged:
Anesthetic,
Arthrocentesis Aspiration,
arthrography,
biopsy,
Correct Choices,
Cpc,
Delozier,
dye,
Fan Page,
fluoroscopy,
Guidance,
Hero,
Localization,
Needle Placement,
Option 1,
Orthopedist,
Professional Component,
Subacromial Bursa,
Subscriber,
Transcripts |