Coding Strategy

Find out what additional information V codes provide to the payer.

Question: We have a patient with previous spinal injury that is now causing neck pain. How should I code the diagnosis?

North Carolina Subscriber

Answer: Document and code prior conditions that contribute to a patient’s current complaint — if they affect the management of the current condition. Prior trauma, such as a previously broken bone or other injury, can cause patients to experience back pain. If the patient’s pain stems from a previous condition, you may code that diagnosis to justify pain management procedures your neurosurgeon performs. Depending on the situation, there may be late-effect codes or V codes that you may report in addition to the current complaint that show a late effect or a personal history of trauma.

Option 1: If the patient’s chronic neck pain is documented as due to a prior traumatic vertebral fracture — at C2-C3, for instance — you could code this as:

• 338.21 — Chronic pain due to trauma
• 723.1 — Neck pain
• 905.1 — Late effect of cervical closed fracture.

Option 2: If your provider’s documentation does not include a “cause and effect” link to the current condition, you could code this scenario as 338.21, 723.1, and V15.51 (Personal history of injury, healed traumatic fracture).

Personal history “V codes” provide additional information to the payer indicating that the patient has had this condition or disease in the past but do not include any causality for the patient’s current complaints.

The key to the correct coding of these contributory conditions is making sure they are appropriately documented in the medical record. This information is central to justifying medical necessity.

@ Neurosurgery Coding Alert

Become a neurosurgery coding hero by attending this encore presentation of 2010 Neurosurgery Coding Update, led by Dr. Gregory Przybylski.

Related articles:

1. ICD-9 2010: More Coding Options for Brain Injury Check out V80.01 and V80.09 for special screenings. The...
2. Dx Coding Moves That Stop Denials for Chronic Pain ClaimsTip: Code prior conditions in these cases. Imagine your pain...
3. How Do I Code This Multiple Fracture Accident Patient?Question: A 30-year-old female presents to a rural ED with...

Before coding 94664, check off these items.

Question: Under the direction of my pulmonologist I recently submitted 94664 for reimbursement for training time, but the bill was rejected? Can I challenge this?

Answer: You can challenge training denials, provided your documentation supports the education’s reason. However, “not all payers will pay for 94664,” notes Gary N. Gross, MD, executive vice president of the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

If practices abuse the code, probably fewer payers will pay the approximately $14 national rate.

Solution: To support reporting 94664 (Demonstration and/or evaluation of patient utilization of an aerosol generator, nebulizer, metered dose inhaler or IPPB device), documentation should include an indication of medical necessity, Gross stresses.

The physician should state in the chart’s plan or treatment portion two items: that the patient requires a teaching session on the use of his MDI, discus, nebulizer, etc., and why the session is needed. A statement could read, “The patient did not demonstrate the proper use of his MDI.”

© Supercoder.com

Available on CD: 2010 Update for pulmonology coders. With Jill Young.

Related articles:

1. Surgery Coding Challenge: Master Microsurgery Units With This AdviceCheck your EOB to make sure payers don’t apply a...
2. 52214 Coding Challenge: Fulguration, Then TUIBNCQuestion: If my physician went to do a TUIBNC and...
3. Radiology Coding Challenge: Why is Medicare Denying a 38792, 78195 ClaimTip: Discover true meaning of 38792 note Question: The physician...