Posts tagged ‘modifier 25’

Are you a 'gold star' ASC coder?

Understand ‘significant’ and ‘separate’ to earn a gold star.

Knowing when to report modifiers and choosing the best one for each situation can be an easy trip-up for coders. If you find yourself especially befuddled by modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service), keep reading for real-world tips that will help you code confidently every time.

Starting point: Remember you can only consider reporting modifier 25 when coding an E/M service. If the procedures you’re reporting don’t fall under E/M services, check whether the encounter qualifies for modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) instead.

1. Verify That Service Is Significant

As CPT’s Appendix A explains, a significant and separately identifiable service “is defined or substantiated by documentation that satisfies the relevant criteria for the respective E/M service to be reported.” Ask yourself two questions when deciding if your case meets the criteria:

  • Could the complaint or problem stand alone as a billable service? A single trigger point injection (20552, Injection[s]; single or multiple trigger point[s], 1 or 2 muscle[s]), for example, qualifies as a stand-alone service you might see in conjunction with an E/M visit.
  • Do you have a different diagnosis for the portion of the visit unrelated to the initial service? For example, the patient might be in the office for a planned knee injection, but also complains of shoulder pain during the visit.

Reporting an E/M code with modifier 25 would be appropriate for the services performed and documented concerning the shoulder.

If you can answer “yes” to either question, you’re one step closer to reporting modifier 25.

Example: “My physicians complete a lot of lumbar and cervical injections that have a 0-day global period,” says Mary Baierl, RHIT, CPC, CCA, CMT, a coder with BayCare Clinic, Pain Management and Rehabilitation Medicine in Green Bay, Wis. “When they evaluate the patient in the office, offer an injection, and have time to do the injection that day, we code the injection and include office visit E/M code with modifier 25 as a separately identifiable service.”

2. Check for Additional Work

If the diagnosis remains the same, Quita Edwards, CCS-P, CPC, COSC, CPC-I, owner of CASE Contracting Services in Fort Valley, Ga., says you have a third question to ask: Did your orthopedist perform extra work that went above and beyond the typical pre- or postoperative work associated with the procedure code? Another affirmative answer points you to modifier 25.

Example: A patient comes to your office for a scheduled joint injection. She has received injections to treat knee pain due to osteoarthritis but they don’t provide long-term relief. During the appointment your physician says she needs to begin thinking about surgical intervention. He spends between 30 and 40 minutes discussing the risks and benefits of surgery so the patient can make an informed decision.

Even though the diagnosis you report for the injection and the E/M service will be the same, you can separately report the two services in this case. “The physician spent enough time discussing the surgery to count as significant and separately identifiable from the injection,” Edwards explains. “You can bill an E/M code with modifier 25 based on the amount of time he spent, even though he didn’t evaluate the patient.”

3. Look for Pre-Planning

Modifier 25 is meant for those “oh, by the way” type situations, not procedures that are tied to previous services. Consider these scenarios and whether you think they merit modifier 25, then watch the Medical Coding News for our experts’ recommendations.

Scenario 1: Your orthopedist sees Mrs. Jones in the office and gives her a prescription for pain medication to help her wrist pain. He says that if this doesn’t help, he’ll give her a wrist injection when she returns. Mrs. Jones returns to the office two weeks later for the injection. Your physician completes another evaluation prior to administering the injection.

Scenario 2: Your physician treats Mrs. Adams for a minor shoulder injury. She returns a few days later because her arm was snatched during activity and she’s experiencing significant pain. The physician completes a full evaluation before prescribing treatment.

Scenario 3: Your surgeon completes total hip arthroplasty on Mr. Brown. Six weeks after the surgery, Mr. Brown returns to your office and sees a different physician because of an ankle sprain.

@ Orthopedic Coding Alert

Be a modifier coding hero. Attend the Surgical Modifier Round-up For Specialty Coders, presented by Leesa A. Israel.

Check out this week’s free webinar on the HPI elements of E/M coding. Join the Supercoder Facebook Fanpage for more details.

Related articles:

  1. Modifier Cheat Sheet: Banish Your E/M Modifier Phobias ForeverOnce you have this tool, you’ll never again wonder which...
  2. Second Surgery Coding: Tips for Modifier 58, 78 SuccessDon’t let ‘unplanned’ lead to ‘unpaid.’ The next time a...
  3. Modifier 57 Alone Should Preclude the Need for 25 Medicare carriers don’t require you to append both modifiers....

Don’t forget to include the code for the arthrocentesis.

Question: A new patient sees the orthopedist because of shoulder problems. The physician schedules an MRI and the patient returns the following week to discuss the findings. The physician had already reviewed the films and goes over them in depth with the patient. He also administered a shoulder joint injection to help relieve the patient’s pain.

What diagnosis should we report with the E/M service to reflect the amount of time spent reviewing films and counseling the patient and to distinguish it from the injection?

West Virginia Subscriber

Answer: Select a diagnosis based on your provider’s documentation, such as rotator cuff tear (840.4, Sprains and strains of shoulder and upper arm; rotator cuff [capsule], or 727.61, Rupture of tendon, nontraumatic; complete rupture of rotator cuff). Include that diagnosis with …

… the appropriate E/M code for your physician’s service (99211-99215, Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient …). Append modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) to the E/M code.

Also report 20610 (Arthrocentesis, aspiration and/or injection; major joint or bursa [e.g., shoulder, hip, knee joint, subacromial bursa]) with 719.41 (Pain in joint; shoulder region) for the shoulder injection.

@ Orthopedic Coding Alert

Be a hero. Join the coding community at the Supercoder Fan Page.

Want to know more about orthopedic coding? Attend the 2010 Orthopedic Coding Update training event and the Shoulder Surgery Coding Secrets You Need to Know audio conference.

Related articles:

  1. ICD-9 Coding for Rotator Cuff Pain: 727.61 or 840.4?Question: In treating pain stemming from an injury to the...
  2. Orthopedic Coding Quick Start Guide: ASC Shoulder ProceduresShoulder ICD-9 and CPT codes you’ll most likely see in...
  3. Rotator Cuff Repair Coding: Catch the Arthroscopy Every Time Acute or chronic? A $60 difference is at stake....

Reading 44373’s code descriptor is key to getting your G Tube claim right.

Question: The gastroenterologist goes to the hospital to treat a patient that had recently been admitted because his gastrojejunostomy tube had migrated to his stomach. After performing a problem focused interval history and exam, the gastroenterologist decides to perform an EGD to reposition the tube. I cannot find a code for repositioning a G tube; how should I code this scenario?

Answer: Judging by your encounter description, the patient’s percutaneous jejunostomy tube (J tube) slipped and became a percutaneous gastrostomy tube (G tube). On the claim, report the following:

  • 44373 (Small intestinal endoscopy, enteroscopy beyond second portion of duodenum, not including ileum; with conversion of percutaneousgastrostomy tube to a percutaneous jejunostomy tube) for the EGD;
  • 99231 (Subsequent hospital care, per day, for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires at least 2 of these 3 key components: a problem focused interval history; a problem focused examination; medical decision making that is straightforward or of low complexity …) for the E/M;
  • modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) appended to 99231 to show that the E/M and tube fix were separate services; and
  • 536.42 (Disorders of function of stomach; gastrostomy complications; mechanical complication of gastrostomy) appended to 44373 and 99231 to represent the patient’s condition.

Explanation: The descriptor for 44373 might be a bit misleading, but it mentions only “tube conversion.” The tube does not necessarily have to be new.

@ Gastroenterology Coding Alert

Become a gastroenterology coding hero by attending Jill Young’s Things You Shouldn’t Have to Swallow in Gastroenterology Billing audio conference. Reserve your spot today!

Related articles:

  1. Gastroenterology Coding Education: Bravo Cap Placements Question: A new patient reports to the gastroenterologist with complaints...
  2. How Should I Code a Fibrinolytic Agent Instillation Via Chest Tube?Different calendar dates matter, but multiple instillations the same day...
  3. Winter Laceration Repair: How Do I Code For Dermabond?Warning: Your coding will vary depending on who’s getting the...

Heads up: 2 nosebleed codes are not the answer.

Question: A patient reports to the ED after sustaining injuries during a soccer match; she was hit in the face with a ball, her nose is bleeding, and her right eye is blackened. The physician is not able to stop the bleeding with ice or pressure, so she performs repeated and extensive cautery using a silver nitrate stick on both nostrils. The bleeding relents, and the physician orders an x-ray to ensure that the patient’s nose is not broken.

Results are negative. Notes indicate a level-four E/M. Can I report 30903 x 2, since the physician stopped bleeding in both nostrils? No, you’ll report this under bilateral procedure guidelines. On the claim, report the following:

Answer: No, you’ll report this under bilateral procedure guidelines. On the claim, report the following:

• 30903 (Control nasal hemorrhage, anterior, complex [ extensive cautery and/or packing] and method) for the repair

• modifier 50 (Bilateral procedure) appended to 30903 to show that the physician treated both nostrils

• 99284 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires these 3 key components: a detailed history; a detailed examination; and medical decision making of moderate complexity …) for the E/M

• modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) appended to 99284 to show that the E/M and repair were separate services

• 784.7 (Epistaxis) appended to 30903 and 99284 to represent the patient’s nosebleed

• E917.0 (Striking against or struck accidentally by objects or persons; in sports without subsequent fall) appended to 30903 and 99284 to represent the cause of the patient’s nosebleed.

• E007.5 (Activities involving other sports and athletics played as a team or group; soccer) appended to 30903 and 99284 to represent the circumstances surrounding the patient’s nosebleed.

© ED Coding Alert. Download your 2 FREE sample issues.

AUDIO TRAINING EVENT: Caral Edelberg teaches you how to find lost reimbursement by correctly coding the TOP ED PROCEDURES MOST CODERS MISS.

Related articles:

  1. Is 30901 Your Nosebleed Code? Not So Fast?Hint: Look for these keywords in the note to select...
  2. Winter Laceration Repair: How Do I Code For Dermabond?Warning: Your coding will vary depending on who’s getting the...
  3. How Do I Code This Multiple Fracture Accident Patient?Question: A 30-year-old female presents to a rural ED with...

Careful: A pilonidal cyst I&D is a separate animal.

Question: A patient presents to the ED reporting pain in her spine. During the exam portion of a level-three E/M, the physician discovers that the painful area is red, and slightly warm to the touch. The patient also has a low-grade fever that she says she noticed about two days ago. The physician makes a shallow incision with a scalpel at the base of the patient’s spine and drains the pus from the area. I reported 10060 and received a denial. Why?

Answer: You chose a standard incision and drainage (I&D) code when you should have opted for a pilonidal cyst I&D code. When you re-submit the claim, report the following:

• 10080 (Incision and drainage of pilonidal cyst; simple) for the I&D

• 99283 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires these 3 key components: an expanded problem focused history; an expanded problem focused examination; and medical decision making of moderate complexity …) for the E/M

• modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) appended to 99283 to show that it was separate from the I&D

• 685.0 (Pilonidal cyst; with abscess) appended to 10080 and 99283 to represent the patient’s injury.

Explanation: Typically, you’ll code simple I&Ds with 10060 (Incision and drainage of abscess [e.g., carbuncle, supprative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia; simple or single]) — a pilonidal cyst, however, is an exception.

When the physician performs I&Ds near the lower back or bottom of the coccyx, check to be sure he isn’t draining a pilonidal cyst, or you could miscode the encounter.

© ED Coding Alert. Download your 2 FREE sample issues here.

AUDIO: Caral Edelberg teaches you how to find lost reimbursement by correctly coding the TOP ED PROCEDURES MOST CODERS MISS.

Related articles:

  1. Winter Laceration Repair: How Do I Code For Dermabond?Warning: Your coding will vary depending on who’s getting the...
  2. Know What Separates FBR From E/M or Lose $80 in Pay Here’s why ‘incision’ with non-scalpel instrument could be an...
  3. Wound Closure Coding: Make the Simple, Intermediate DistinctionAccounting for depth is a tricky task when coding closure....